A Simple But Effective Approach of Building Footprint Extraction in Topographic Mapping Acceleration

Authors

  • Danang Budi Susetyo Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Aldino Rizaldy Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Mochamad Irwan Hariyono Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nugroho Purwono Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Fahrul Hidayat Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Rizka Windiastuti Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Tia Rizka N. Rachma Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Prayudha Hartanto Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17014/ijog.8.3.329-343

Keywords:

building footprint, LiDAR, classification, segmentation

Abstract

DOI:10.17014/ijog.8.3.329-343

Topographic mapping using stereo plotting is not effective, because it takes much time and labour-intensive. Thus, this research was conducted to find the effective way to extract building footprint for mapping acceleration from LiDAR data. Building extraction method in this process comprises four steps: ground/non-ground filtering, building classification, segmentation, and building extraction. Classification of ground and non-ground classes was performed using Adaptive-TIN Surface algorithm. Non-ground points from filtering process were classified as building with the algorithm based on multiscale local dimensionality to separate points at the maximum separability plane. Segmentation using segment growing was used to separate each building, so boundary detection could be conducted for each segment to create boundary of each building. Lastly, building extraction was conducted through three steps: boundary point detection, building delineation, and building regularization. With ten samples and step 0.5, classification resulted in quality and miss factor of 0.597 and 0.524, respectively. The quality was improved by segmentation process to 0.604, while miss factor was getting worse to 0.561. Meanwhile, on the average shape index value from extracted building had 0.02 difference, and the number of errors was 30% for the line segment comparison. Regarding positional accuracy using centroid accuracy assessment, this method could produce RMSE of 1.169 m.

Author Biographies

Danang Budi Susetyo, Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia

Research Division

Aldino Rizaldy, Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia

Center for Topographic Mapping and Toponym

Mochamad Irwan Hariyono, Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia

Research Division

Nugroho Purwono, Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia

Research Division

Fahrul Hidayat, Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia

Research Division

Rizka Windiastuti, Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia

Research Division

Tia Rizka N. Rachma, Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia

Research Division

Prayudha Hartanto, Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia

Research Division

Downloads

Published

11-08-2021

How to Cite

Susetyo, D. B., Rizaldy, A., Hariyono, M. I., Purwono, N., Hidayat, F., Windiastuti, R., … Hartanto, P. (2021). A Simple But Effective Approach of Building Footprint Extraction in Topographic Mapping Acceleration. Indonesian Journal on Geoscience, 8(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.17014/ijog.8.3.329-343

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.