Assessment of Bedugul Geothermal Prospect Using A Numerical Reservoir Modeling

Versions

pdf

Keywords

Bedugul
numerical model
natural state
resource assessment
geothermal

How to Cite

Keintjem, R. J., Pratama, H. B., Tawakal, A., Wardana, A. P., Hamdani, M. R., Abdillah, Y. Z., & Sutopo, S. (2023). Assessment of Bedugul Geothermal Prospect Using A Numerical Reservoir Modeling. Indonesian Journal on Geoscience, 10(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.17014/ijog.10.2.181-200

Abstract

A numerical modeling was carried out to generate a numerical model of the Bedugul geothermal field located in Bali Island, Indonesia. This study presents a natural state model and updates the conceptual model of Bedugul based on published geological, geophysical, geochemical, and well data. The numerical simulation of the Bedugul geothermal field has been developed using the previous conceptual model and well data. The Bedugul reservoir model is properly aligned with actual Pressure and Temperature well data. Thus, the natural state model is used to update the Bedugul conceptual model. The main updated points of the conceptual model were the location of the heat source to be beneath Mount Tapak, adding the flow fluid pattern as outflow and upflow location, caprock, reservoir, recharge, discharge, and adding iso-temperature distribution. Based on the numerical model result, the Bedugul geothermal field is a waterdominated geothermal system. The results of this model have been applied to the heat stored method with the Monte Carlo simulation to generate a probabilistic distribution of the reserve potential estimation. The probabilistic for P50 of probable and proven reserve estimation for thirty years are 136.3 MW and 33.4 MW, respectively.

Keywords: Bedugul, numerical model, natural state, resource assessment, geothermal

https://doi.org/10.17014/ijog.10.2.181-200
pdf

References

Afiat, Idianto, O., Rera, G. F., Wardoyo, G. K., Sutopo, Pratama, H. B., & Hamdani, M. R. (2021). Updated Conceptual Model and Resource Assessment using Numerical Reservoir Simulation of Danau Ranau Geothermal Field Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 732(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/732/1/012027

Ashat, A., & Pratama, H. B. (2017). Application of experimental design in geothermal resources assessment of Ciwidey-Patuha, West Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 103.

Ashat, A., Pratama, H. B., & Itoi, R. (2019a). Comparison of resource assessment methods with numerical reservoir model between heat stored and experimental design: Case study Ciwidey-Patuha geothermal field. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 254.

Ashat, A., Pratama, H. B., & Itoi, R. (2019b). Updating conceptual model of Ciwidey-Patuha geothermal using dynamic numerical model. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 254.

Ashat, A., Ridwan, R. H., Judawisastra, L. H., Situmorang, J., Elfajrie, I., Atmaja, R. W., Iskandar, C., & Ibrahim, R. F. I. (2019). Conceptual model and numerical simulation update of Patuha geothermal field, West Java, Indonesia. Proceedings 41st New Zealand Geothermal Workshop, Auckland, New Zealand.

Bogie, I., Joenoes, E. J., Sugiono, S. R. A., Hallinan, S., & Watts, D. (2010). Development implications arising from the reinterpretation of the results of a 3D MT Inversion at Bedugul, Bali, Indonesia. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2010.

Ciriaco, A. E., Zarrouk, S. J., & Zakeri, G. (2020). Geothermal resource and reserve assessment methodology: Overview, analysis and future directions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119.

Hamdani, M. R. (2019). Evaluasi produksi berkelanjutan pada pembangkit listrik single-flash dan siklus kombinasi menggunakan simulasi numerik suatu sistem panas bumi dominasi-air. Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Hamdani, M. R., Pratama, H. B., & Sutopo. (2020). Updating the Conceptual Model of Lumut Balai Geothermal Field, South Sumatera, Indonesia Using Numerical Simulation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/417/1/012023

Hasbi, H. G. F., Hamdani, M. R., Prasetyo, A. B. T., Agung Reynaldi Khrisna, W., Lampuasa, M. J., Sutopo, Pratama, H. B., & Prabata, T. W. (2020). Application of numerical simulation to update conceptual model and resource assessment of Songa-Wayaua geothermal field. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 417.

Hidayat, I., Sutopo, & Pratama, H. B. (2018). Probabilistic approach of resource assessment in Kerinci geothermal field using numerical simulation coupling with monte carlo simulation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 103.

Hochstein, M. P. (1990). Classification and Assessment of Geothermal Resources. June 1990, 326–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043865-8/50063-5

Jatmiko, B. W., Pratama, H. B., & Sutopo. (2021). Updated Numerical Model of Mataloko Geothermal Field. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 732(1), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/732/1/012024

KESDM. (2017). Potensi Panas Bumi Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Energi Baru Terbarukan dan Konservasi Energi Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral.

Kurniawan, I., Sutopo, S., Pratama, H. B., & Adiprana, R. (2019). A natural state model and resource assessment of Ulumbu Geothermal field. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 254.

Lesmana, A. (2019). Kajian tekno eknomi pada pemiihan skenario pengembangan lapangan panas bumi menggunakan model numerik dan model finansial. Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Lesmana, A., Berian Pratama, H., Ashat, A., Saptadji, N. M., & Gunawan, F. (2019). An Updated Conceptual Model of the Tompaso Geothermal Field Using Numerical Simulation. Proceedings 41st New Zealand Geothermal Workshop, 25-27 November.

Muffler, P., & Cataldi, R. (1978). Methods for regional assessment of geothermal resources. Geothermics, 7, 53–89.

Mulyadi, A., & Hochstein, M. P. (1981). Exploration of the Bratan Caldera Geothermal Prospect (Central Bali). Proceedings of the New Zealand Geothermal Workshop, June, 189–193.

Mulyadi, A., Joenoes, E. J., & Widiasari, N. M. (2005). Bedugul geothermal prospect and developments. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress.

Nathenson, M. (1975). Physical factors determining the fraction of stored energy recoverable from hydrothermal convection systems and conduction-dominated areas. In Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif. (USA).

Prabata, W., Sutopo, S., & Pratama, H. B. (2019). Experimental design and response surface method application in resources assessment: Case study Karaha-Talaga Bodas, West Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 254.

Pradhipta, Y. D., Sutopo, S., Pratama, H. B., & Adiprana, R. (2019). Natural state modeling of Mataloko Geothermal field, Flores Island, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia using TOUGH2 simulator. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 254(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/254/1/012027

Pratama, H. B., & Saptadji, N. M. (2015). Study of Production-Injection Strategies of Synthetic Geothermal Reservoir Liquid-Dominated Model With Numerical Study of Production-Injection Strategies of Synthetic Geothermal Reservoir Liquid-Dominated Model. January 2017.

Pratama, H. B., & Saptadji, N. M. (2016). Numerical Simulation for Natural State of Two-Phase Liquid Dominated Geothermal Reservoir with Steam Cap Underlying Brine Reservoir. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 42(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/42/1/012006

Pratama, H. B., & Saptadji, N. M. (2018). Study of sustainable production in two-phase liquid dominated with steam cap underlying brine reservoir by numerical simulation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 103(1), 0–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/103/1/012005

Pratama, H. B., & Saptadji, N. M. (2021). Study of Production-Injection Strategies for Sustainable Production in Geothermal Reservoir Two-Phase by Numerical Simulation. Indonesian Journal on Geoscience, 18(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.17014/ijog.8.1.25-38

Pratama, H. B., Supijo, M. C., & Sutopo. (2020). Experimental design and response surface method in geothermal energy: A comprehensive study in probabilistic resource assessment. Geothermics, 87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101869

Pruess, K., Oldenburg, C., & Moridis, G. (1999). TOUGH2 user’s guide.

Purnomo, B. J., & Pichler, T. (2015). Geothermal systems on the island of Bali, Indonesia. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 304, 349–358.

Putra, R. P. M., Sutopo, S., & Pratama, H. B. (2019). Improved natural state simulation of Arjuno-Welirang geothermal field, East Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 254.

Sarmiento, Z. F., Steingrímsson, B., & Axelsson, G. (2013). Volumetric resource assessment. Short Course V on Conceptual Modelling of Geothermal Systems UNU-GTP.

Seyedrahimi-Niaraq, M., Doulati Ardejani, F., Noorollahi, Y., Porkhial, S., Itoi, R., & Jalili Nasrabadi, S. (2019). A three-dimensional numerical model to simulate Iranian NW Sabalan geothermal system. Geothermics, 77, 42–61.

Sumartha, A. G. A., Kurniawan, I., Wiradinata, R., Nandaliarasyad, N., Sutopo, Pratama, H. B., & Prabata, T. W. (2020). Updating the conceptual model of Cisolok-Cisukarame geothermal field, West Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 417.

Supijo, M. C., Pratama, H. B., & Sutopo. (2020). Response Surface Method Using Box-Behnken Design for Probabilistic Resource Assessment: A Case Study in Atadei Geothermal Field, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/417/1/012022

Supijo, M. C., Wahjono, A. D., Lesmana, A., Harahap, A. H., Sutopo, Pratama, H. B., & Prabata, T. W. (2018). Updating conceptual model using numerical modelling for geothermal green field prospect area in Atadei, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. The 6th Indonesia International Geothermal Convention & Exhibition (IIGCE) 2018 Proceedings.

Sutopo, Prabata, W., & Pratama, H. B. (2019). The development study of Karaha – Talaga Bodas geothermal field using numerical simulation. Geothermal Energy, 7(21).

ThinkGeoEnergy. (2013). Bali rejects plans for geothermal development on religious grounds. Https://Www.Thinkgeoenergy.Com/Bali-Rejects-Plans-for-Geothermal-Development-on-Religious-Grounds/.

ThinkGeoEnergy. (2019). Governor of Bali asks Indonesian government to stop planned geothermal project. Https://Www.Thinkgeoenergy.Com/Governor-of-Bali-Asks-Indonesian-Government-to-Stop-Planned-Geothermal-Project/.

Tim Potensi Panasbumi ESDM, D. V. (1994). Laporan Proyek Penyelidikan Gunungapi dan Panasbumi: Geologi Panasbumi Daerah Buyan-Bratan, Bali.

IJOG as the journal holds copyright of the published papers.