Penentuan Peringkat Bahaya Tsunami dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Studi kasus: Wilayah Pesisir Kabupaten Sukabumi)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17014/ijog.4.2.103-116Keywords:
hazard factor, tsunami, Analytical Hierarchy Process, SukabumiAbstract
https://dx.doi.org/10.17014/ijog.vol4no2.20093
Hierarchy structure of a tsunami risk encompasses the study of hazard, vulnerability, and capac- ity factors. The focus of this research is hazard factors, with indicators comprise beach slope, beach coarseness (surface material), run up, and earthquake intensity. Computation method used in the deci- sion system is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The AHP method is to determine the weight of indicators and matrices of hazard factor hierarchy. The final total score of the hazard factors will be useful for tsunami hazard mapping through a geographic information system (GIS). It consists of four hierarchies of tsunami hazard that are high, middle, low, and safe levels.
The coastal regions in Sukabumi having high tsunami disaster risk are the Gulf of Pelabuhanratu, Ciemas plain (Gulf of Ciletuh), Ujung Genteng Cape, and some parts of coastal plain areas in Sim- penan. Those having middle tsunami disaster risk are coastal area of Surade, Cibitung, Tegalbuleud, whereas those having low tsunami disaster risk are Cisolok cliff, Simpenan, and Ciemas cliff area. The other coastal zones are included into a safe area.
References
Bonham-Carter, G.F., 2002. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS. Computer Methods in The Geosciences, Related Pergamon/Elsevier Science Publications, h. 1–22.
Blackburn, E., Wilson, L., dan Sparks, R. S. J., 1976. Mechanisms and dynamics of strombolian activity. Journal of Geological Society of London, 132, h. 429-440.
Davis, I., Haghebaert, B., dan Peppiatt, 2004. Social Vulnerability, Sustainable & Capacity Analysis. Workshop. Geneva, 25-26 Mei 2004. Geneva: Pro Vention Consortium, h. 1-9.
Imamura, F., Subandono, D., Watson, G., Moore, A., Takahashi, T., Massutomi, H., dan Hidayat, R. 1997. Irian Jaya Earthquake and Tsunami Cause Serious Damage. Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 78, h. 197-201.
Kertapati, E., 2006. Aktivitas Gempa Bumi di Indonesia Perspektif Regional Pada Karakteristik Gempa Bumi Merusak. Pusat Survei Geologi, Bandung.
Kusnida, D., 2004. Geologi Kelautan Wilayah Pesisir Selatan Jawa Barat. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geologi Kelautan, Balitbang ESDM, DESDM, Bandung.
Saaty, T.L., 1994. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, h. 161-176.
Shuto, N., 1993. Tsunami intensity and disasters. Dalam: Tinti, S. dan Dordrecht, S (eds.) Tsunamis in the World. Kluwer Academic Publishers, h. 197-216.
Subandono, D. dan Budiman. 2006. Tsunami. Sarana Komunikasi Utama, Bogor.
Sudradjat, A., 1997. Zona Rawan Bencana Tsunami dalam Ilustrasi Geologi. PT. Grafimatra Tatamedia, Jakarta, h. 140-167.
Soehaimi, 2008. Seismotektonik dan Potensi kegempaan Wilayah Jawa. Jurnal Geologi Indonesia, 3(4), h. 227- 240
USDA-NRCS, 1986. Urban Hydrology for small watersheds. Tech Release TR-55. Washington, DC: Natural Resource Conservation.
Yudichara, 2006. Pemodelan Run Up Tsunami di wilayah Pesisir Sukabumi. Pusat Vulkanologi dan Mitigasi Bencana Geologi, Bandung.
